× Current Issue Archive Submit Article
Conflicts of Interest Copyright and Access Open access policy Editorial Policies Peer Review Policy Privacy Statement Publishing Ethics
Editor in chief Associate Editors Advisory Board International Editors
Contact Us About Us Aim & Scope Abstracting And Indexing Author Guidelines Join As Editor

Fundamental frequency (F0) comparison based on demographic features in post-lingual ‎hearing loss people after cochlear implant


Soheila Nikakhlagh, Nader Saki‎‏, ‏ Atefeh Khaleghi, Peyman Zamani, Arash Bayat, Majid Karimi, Maryam Dastoorpoor

Abstract

Background and Objective: Any change in the auditory system can affect the proper use of ‎speech and audio productions structures.  The reason of this negative effect is the lack of ‎auditory feedback. Voice changes caused by hearing impairment are connected to breathing, ‎voice phonation and speech production. The aim of this study was comparing One of the voice ‎parameters (F0) based on demographic features of post lingual people after cochlear ‎implantation.‎ Methods: The study included 38 (19 male, 19 female) post-lingual hearing-impaired adults who ‎underwent cochlear implantation. The required data are based on information that was provided ‎in the cochlear implant center by patient's file, these data includes demographic information ‎and audiogram that’s collected after cochlear implant. ‎Results: According to the results, we found the most important effected was usage time of ‎cochlear implant on the pronunciation of vowel /a/. It can be said that the implant type of the ‎cochlear implant and the ear that’s taking prosthesis has no significant impact on the ‎performance of the pronunciation of this vowel. Also, we measured the effective factors ‎associated with deafness (i.e. type of hearing loss, duration of deafness and aetiology of ‎deafness) in the participants. These factors cause no significant difference in pronunciation ‎performance of this vowel. Also, the main effect and interaction of these factors did not ‎indicate a significant difference on result of the F0 of this vowel (F<0.842, P=0.486, η2 <0.096, ‎Observed power<0.206).‎ Conclusion: On comparing the variation of results, the most important effect is usage time of ‎cochlear implant on the pronunciation of vowel /a/ and other factors such as implant type and ‎implant side have no significant relationship with this vowel. On the other hand, type of hearing ‎loss, duration of deafness and aetiology of deafness have no significant relationship with vowel ‎‎/a/‎.




Contact Meral


Meral Publications
www.meralpublisher.com

Davutpasa / Zeytinburnu 34087
Istanbul
Turkey

Email: [email protected]
Tell: +905344998991