× Copyright Disclaimer Privacy Policy Author Guidelines Current Issue Archive Publishing Ethics Join As Reviewer Advertise Submit Article Abstracting And Indexing Editorial Board Contact Editor-in-Chief Scope of the Journal About the Journal


JAPER is indexed in SCOPUS

Determination of radical scavenging activity of Creatine lysinate against methanol solutions of ABTS

Dobrina Tsvetkova1*, Ivanka Kostadinova2, Lyubomir Vezenkov3, Lyubomir Marinov2

1Department of Pharmaceutical Сhemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria. 2Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria. 3Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 8 St. Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Correspondence: Dobrina Tsvetkova, Department of Pharmaceutical Сhemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria. [email protected]


ABSTRACT

Dietrary Creatine supplements can exert benefits against muscular dystrophic diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle's disease), and fibromyalgia and can provide protection towards neurodegenerative disorders as Huntington, Parkinson and Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Creatine supplementation improves cognition and memory and can promote muscle strength. Creatine plays an important role in maintaining heart function in congestive heart failure. The current investigation's goal was to learn more about the ability of creatine lysinate to scavenge ABTS-radicals. Radiation scavenging activity [%], idex of inhibition (IC50), antioxidant power (1/IC50), and Trolox equivalent activity were calculated using the reduction in the absorbance at = 744 nm of the methanol solution of the ABTS-radical. Creatine lysinate (IC50 = 62.8 mM) exhibits an antiradical action, as shown by the experimental findings. According to the available data, creatine lysinate is less active than trolox (IC50 = 0.2 mM), which is because it has a greater IC50 value and less antioxidant capacity (1/IC50, = 0.016) than trolox (1/IC50, = 5). In current investigation was confirmed that ABTS-radical scavenging effect of Creatine lysinate is higher in comparison with Creatine monohydrate (IC50 = 100.98 mM), which was proven by the obtained higher Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity TEAC = 0.003 of Creatine lysinate, compared with that of Creatine monohydrate (TEAC = 0.002).

 

Keywords: Creatine lysinate, ABTS, Trolox, Index of inhibition, Antitradical power


Introduction  

The overproduction of high reactive non-stable oxygen and nitrogen free radicals is the reason for occurring of oxidative stress. Another factor which contributes for the development of the oxidative stress is the downregulation in a defence mechanism of the endogenous antioxidant systems in organism. Endogenous free radicals are produced in mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and peroxisomes during the following biochemical processes in cells: oxidation of proatherogenic lipids VLDL and LDL, fatty acids, catecholamines, hemoglobin, pterins and thiols. In the process of oxidative phosphorylation, hyperoxides are synthesized in the mitochondria. Endothelial cells create superoxide radicals to control the vascular smooth muscle's capacity to contract [1].

Because brain neurons consume more oxygen, have more easily oxidizable unsaturated fatty acids in their membranes, and have fewer antioxidant defense systems than other neurons, they are more vulnerable to the effects of oxidative stress brought on by glutamate and beta-amyloid peptide. In Alzheimer's disease the increased oxidative stress is one of the initial neurological pathological changes as dendritic spine loss [2], synaptic [3] and mitochondrial dysfunction [4], and selectively occurs in areas of the brain, responsible for the regulation of memory functions.

Movement disorders affecting muscle function and coordination, and speech development are associated with deficiency syndromes characterized with muscle myopathies and cognitive problems due to low brain Creatine content [5]. For brain functioning, it is crucial that creatine be synthesized and transported throughout the central nervous system [6].

Creatine metabolism gene variability in children [7] is linked to deficient symptoms including muscle weakness, voluntary or involuntary movement [8], cognitive difficulties, or autistic disorder [7]. The production of creatine in the brain is crucial in cases of creatine-deficient disorders [9].

Numerous studies have found that taking a creatine supplement enhances learning and memory [10] and can increase muscular strength [11]. Creatine plays an important role in maintaining heart function in congestive heart failure [12] and in brain or heart ischemia-related damage [13]. It has been suggested that using creatine supplements will improve brain bioenergetics [14], skeletal muscle, bone and brain in aging population [15, 16]. Through its antioxidant effect, Creatine:

  1. protects DNA and RNA from oxidative damage 
  2. preserves the integrity of mitochondria by preventing the formation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species
  3. helps maintain cellular levels of ATP, the marked reduction of which leads to the formation of radicals and tissue oxidative damage [17].

The therapeutic benefits of creatine supplements in the management of neuromuscular, muscular, neurological, and neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson's disease are determined by their complex antioxidant capacity. Lou Gehrig's disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) [18], Huntington [19]. Creatine increases muscle mass and strength in muscular dystrophic diseases [20], such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy [21], myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle's disease) [22].

The prevention of disorders linked to oxidative stress is aided by dietary supplements [23]. The use of multi-ingredient dietary supplements is possible to increase cognitive function [24]. Food components with the characteristics to scavenge free radicals are frequently estimated using the ABTS-assay [25]. By evaluating the reduction in absorbance at = 744 nm, the current study sought to assess the radical-scavenging ability and anti-radical power of creatine lysinate against methanol solutions of the ABTS radical.

Materials and Methods

Materials 

  1. Test compound: Creatine lysinate
  2. Standard for antiradical activity

6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) (Sigma-Aldrich, N:51796 PMV 291913).

  1. Reagents with pharmacopoeial purity
    1. ABTS: diammonium salt of (2,2-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) (Sigma Aldrich, N:SLBH  2992 V)
    2. potassium persulfate (Sigma Aldrich, N:BCBL 7396 V).
  2. Solvents with pharmacopoeial purity
  1. methanol (99.9 %) (Sigma-Aldrich, N:SZBD 063 AV UN 1230).
  2. distilled water.

In-vitro estimation of anti-radical activity of Creatine lysinate by application of  ABTS assay

  1. Preparation of stock solutions  of Creatine lysinate

Phosphate buffer with pH = 6.8  (0.1 g  KH2PO4, 0.2 g K2HPO4, 0.85 g NaCl in 100.0 ml distilled water) was used for dissolving and dilution of measured quantity of 2.7732 g Creatine lysinate (M = 277.32) in volumetric flask of 50.0 ml for the preparation  of  the stock solution with concentration 200 mM (0.2 M).

  1. Preparation of working solutions of Creatine lysinate       

For the preparation of working solutions with final concentrations (2 mM ÷ 160 mM): 2 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 80 mM, 120 mM, 160 mM, the phosphate buffer pH = 6.8 was used for separately dilution to 100.0 ml of aliquot parts respectively of 0.1 ml, 0.5 ml, 1.0 ml, 1.5 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, 8.0 ml from stock solution of 200 mM Creatine lysinate.

  1. Preparation of stock mixed solution of 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate

The stock mixed solution was created by combining equal aliquot portions of 100.0 ml of 2.45 mM potassium persulfate solution and 100.0 ml of 7 mM ABTS stock solution (M = 548.7 and 0.3841 g, respectively, in 100.0 ml of phosphate buffer pH 6.8). The final reagent was left in the dark for 17 hours.

  1. Preparation of working methanol solutions of Trolox for ABTS-assay

Different aliquot portions were diluted with methanol to create solutions with concentrations ranging from 0.002 mM to 0.75 mM after dissolving and diluting 0.0125 g of Trolox (M = 252.294) in a 50.0 ml volumetric flask [26].

 

Method. ABTS – assay

ABTS working solution was obtained by dilution of ABTS stock solution 1 : 10 v/v with methanol. Different aliquot parts of 5.0 ml of this solution were mixed separately respectively with aliquot parts of 5.0 ml of the working solutions of Trolox (0.002 mM ÷ 0.750 mM) or of 5.0 ml Creatine lysinate (2 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM. 40 mM, 80 mM, 120 mM, 160 mM, 200 mM) to obtain final concentrations of Trolox (0.001 mM ÷ 0.375 mM) and of Creatine lysinate (1 mM ÷ 100 mM): 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM, 40 mM, 60 mM, 80 mM, 100 mM. As a control a mixture of 5.0 ml ABTS working solution and 5.0 ml of methanol was used. After shaking the samples were incubated for 10 min. in the dark at 25 oC ÷ 27 oC. An UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard A Diode Array 8452) was used for the measurement after incubation of the absorbances of samples at λ = 744 nm. Methanol was used as a compensatory solvent.

Results and Discussion

      1. Spectra and absorbance of ABTS-radical

Figure 1 illustrates the spectra of ABTS methanol solutions at λ = 744 nm after 10 min. interaction with Creatine lysinate solutions (1 mM ÷ 100 mM). The absorbance of control is 0.99425.

Figure 1. ABTS spectra after interaction with 1 mM ÷ 100 mM Creatine lysinate.

From the obrained ecperimental values of absorbances, the radical-scavenging activity [RSA, (%)] and the unbound ABTS-radical [R, (%)] for Creatine lysinate were calculated (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Absorbance, radical-binding activity [RSA] and unbound ABTS-radi-cal [R] after interaction with 1 mM ÷ 100 mM Creatine lysinate.

N:

C [mM]

A [AU]

RSA [%]

R  [%]

1.

1

0.72621

26.96

73.04

2.

5

0.71712

27.87

72.13

3.

10

0.69722

29.87

70.13

4.

15

0.68407

31.20

68.80

5.

20

0.67290

32.32

67.68

6.

40

0.61565

38.08

61.92

7.

60

0.53627

46.06

53.94

8.

80

0.40353

59.41

40.59

9.

100

0.30324

65.50

30.50

 

The experimental data for the absorbance of ABTS methanol solution at = 744 nm were set against the corresponding concentrations in a linear regression analysis after 10 min. of interaction with creatine lysinate solutions (1 mM, 100 mM) (Figure 2). The findings demonstrated that, at the concentration ranges under investigation, a drop in absorbances was seen as the concentration of the drug under investigation was raised. A coefficient of linear regression in the calibration curve that is greater than 0.97 was used to define linearity (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Absorbances of ABTS-radical after interaction with 1 mM ÷ 100 mM Creatine lysinate.

 

      1. ABTS-radical scavenging effect

The radical-scavenging activity [RSA, (%)] for Creatine lysinate was calculated by the equation:

(1)

AABTS control: absorbance of the ABTS-radical solution before contact with the substance under investigation

Sample: the absorbance of the ABTS-radical solution after interacting with the target chemical

The data for ABTS-radical scavenging effect of Creatine lysinate (1 mM ÷ 100 mM) were subjected to a linear regression analysis. The calibration curve for the linear connection between the improved radical scavenging activity and the concentration increase from 1 mM to 100 mM is shown in Figure 3. Regression coefficient values greater than 0.97 demonstrate linearity.

 

Figure 3. ABTS-radical scavenging activity of 1 mM ÷ 100 mM Creatine lysinate.

 

      1. Unbound ABTS-radical

The values for the unbound ABTS-radical [R, %)] from Creatine lysinate (1 mM ÷ 100 mM) were calculated by the equation:

 

(2)

 

AABTS control: absorbance of the ABTS-radical solution before contact with the substance under investigation  

Sample: the absorbance of the ABTS-radical solution after interacting with the target chemical 

Figure 4 shows calibration curve for linear relationship between the decreased s for not-scavenged ABTS- radical with the increase of concentration of Creatine lysinate  from 1 mM to 100 mM.

Figure 4. Not-scavenged ABTS-radical after interaction with 1 mM ÷ 100 mM Creatine lysinate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      1. Calculation of IC50 value (inhibitory concentration) and antioxidant power: 1/IC50...

Regression analysis was used as a technique. The IC50 value, which identifies the amount of antioxidant that reduces the number of radicals by 50%, was calculated using the derived regression equations for creatine lysinate. 

For the calculation of IC50 the following equatioms  were used:

 

 y=163․2․v+17․29        (Trolox)  [26]

(3)

y=0․3959․v+25․136       (Creatine lysinate)

(4)

 

High radical-scavenging activity is associated with low IC50 value, which defines that at lower concentration the compounds exert high antiradical effect.

In our previous srudy [26] it was confirmed that standard Trolox (IC50 = 0.2 mM) exhibits the higher antioxidant effect than Creatine monohydrate (IC50 = 100.98 mM; 1/IC50 = 0.01).

According to the current experimental findings, although creatine lysinate has an antiradical impact (IC50 = 62.8 mM; 1/IC50 = 0.016), it is less effective than trolox (IC50 = 0.2 mM) because it has a greater IC50 value and less antioxidant power (1/IC50, = 0.016) than trolox (1/IC50, = 5).

      1. Calculation of Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity

The Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), which was determined as follows, was used to express the sample's ABTS radical scavenging activity:

 

(5)

 

The higher TEAC value means the higher ABTS radical-scavenging activity.

In our previous srudy [26] for Creatine monohydrate was calculated TEAC = 0.002. In current study for the ABTS-radical scavenging activity of Creatibe lysinate, expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity was obtained: TEAC = 0.003.

Conclusion

According to the experimental findings, creatine lysinate has a stronger ABTS-radical scavenging activity than creatine monohydrate (IC50 = 100.98 mM), but a lesser scavenging impact than the standard drug Trolox (IC50 = 0.2 mM).

Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments to Prof. Nikolai Danchev. and Ivalina Ivanova.

Conflict of interest: All of the authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Financial support: This article was prepared with the financial support from Grant 2021 Project N: D-106/04.06.2021, Contract N:7892/19.11.2020, Medical University-Sofia, Bulgaria.

Ethics statement: None

References

1.       Losada-Barreiro S, Bravo-Díaz C. Free radicals and polyphenols: the redox chemistry of neurodegenerative diseases. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;133(1):379-402. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.03.061      

2.       Knobloch M, Mansuy IM. Dendritic spine loss and synaptic alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;37(1):73-82. doi:10.1007/s12035-008-8018-z

3.       Forero DA, Casadesus G, Perry G, Arboleda H. Synaptic dysfunction and oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease: emerging mechanisms. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10(3):796-805. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00439.x

4.       Schmitt K, Grimm A, Kazmierczak A, Strosznajder JB, Götz J, Eckert A. Insights into mitochondrial dysfunction: aging, amyloid-β, and tau-A deleterious trio. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2012;16(12):1456-66. doi:10.1089/ars.2011.4400

5.       Nasrallah F, Feki M, Kaabachi N. Creatine and Creatine deficiency syndromes: biochemical and clinical aspects. Pediatr Neurol.  2010;42(3):163-71. doi:10.1016/ j.pediatrneurol.2009.07.015

6.       Beard E, Braissant O. Synthesis and transport of Creatine in the CNS: importance for cerebral functions. J Neurochem. 2010;115(2):297-313. doi:10.1111/ j.1471-4159.2010.06935.x

7.       Cameron JM, Levandovskiy V, Roberts W, Anagnostou E, Scherer S, Loh A, et al. Variability of Creatine metabolism genes in children with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(8):1665. doi:10.3390/ijms18081665

8.       Sykut-Cegielska J, Gradowska W, Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S, Stockler-Ipsiroglu S. Biochemical and clinical characteristics of creatine deficiency syndromes. Acta Biochim Pol. 2004;51(4):875-82.

9.       Braissant O, Henry H, Beard E, Uldry J. Creatine deficiency syndromes and the importance of creatine synthesis in the brain. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1315-24. doi:10.1007/s00726-011-0852-z

10.    Rawson ES, Venezia AC. Use of Creatine in the elderly and evidence for effects on cognitive function in young and old. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1349-62. doi:10.1007/s00726-011-0855-9

11.    Riesberg LA, Weed SA, McDonald TL, Eckerson JM, Drescher KM. Beyond muscles: the untapped potential of creatine. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;37:31-42. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2015.12.034

12.    Kuethe F, Krack A, Richartz BM, Figulla HR. Creatine supplementation improves muscle strength in patients with congestive heart failure. Pharmazie. 2006;61(3):218-22.

13.    Perasso L, Spallarossa P, Gandolfo C, Ruggeri P, Balestrino M. Therapeutic use of Creatine in brain or heart ischemia: available data and future perspectives. Med Res Rev. 2013;33(2):336-63. doi:10.1002/med.20255

14.    Agren H, Niklasson F. Creatinine and creatine in CSF: indices of brain energy metabolism in depression. Short note. J Neural Transm. 1988;74(1):55-9. doi:10.1007/ BF01243575

15.    Gualano B, Rawson ES, Candow DG, Chilibeck PD. Creatine supplementation in the aging population: effects on skeletal muscle, bone and brain. Amino Acids. 2016;48(8):1793-805. doi:10.1007/s00726-016-2239-7

16.    Forbes SC, Candow DG, Ferreira LHB, Souza-Junior TP. Effects of Creatine supplementation on properties of muscle, bone, and brain function in older adults: a narrative review. J Diet Suppl. 2022;19(3):318-35. doi:10.1080/19390211.2021.1877232

17.    Meyer LE, Machado LB, Santiago APSA, da-Silva WS, de Felice GG, Holub O, et al. Mitochondrial creatine kinase activity prevents reactive oxygen species generation: antioxidant role of mitochondrial kinase-dependent ADP recycling activity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(49):37361-71. doi:10.1074/jbc.M604123200

18.    Mazzini L, Balzarini C, Colombo R, Mora G, Pastore I, De Ambrogio R, et al. Effects of Creatine supplementation on exercise performance and muscular strength in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: preliminary results. J Neurol Sci. 2001;191(1-2):139-44. doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00611-6

19.    Hersch SM, Gevorkian S, Marder K, Moskowitz C, Feigin A, Cox M, et al. Creatine in Huntington disease is safe, tolerable, bioavailable in brain and reduces serum 8OH2’ dG. Neurology. 2006;66(2):250-2. doi:10.1212/01. wnl.0000194318.74946.b6

20.    Louis M, Lebacq J, Poortmans JR, Belpaire-Dethiou MC, Devogelaer JP, van Hecke P, et al. Beneficial effects of Creatine supplementation in dystrophic patients. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27(5):604-10. doi:10.1002/mus.10355

21.    Tarnopolsky MA, Mahoney DJ, Vajsar J, Rodriguez C, Doherty TJ, Roy BD, et al. Creatine monohydrate enhances strength and body composition in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurol. 2004;62(10):1771-7. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000125178.18862.9d

22.    Vorgerd M, Grehl T, Jager M, Muller K, Freitag G,  Patzold T, et al. Creatine therapy in myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle disease): a placebo-controlled crossover trial. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(7):956-63.  doi:10.1001/archneur.57.7.956

23.    Losada-Barreiro S, Sezgin-Bayindir Z, Paiva-Martins F, Bravo-Díaz C. Biochemistry of antioxidants: mechanisms and pharmaceutical applications. Biomedicines. 2022;10(12):3051. doi:10.3390/biomedicines/10123051

24.    Bell KE, Fang H, Snijders T, Allison DJ, Zulyniak MA, Chabowski A, et al. A multiingredient nutritional supplement in combination with resistance exercise and high-intensity interval training improves cognitive function and increases N-3 index in healthy older men: a randomized controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:107. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00107

25.    Xiao F, Xu T, Lu B, Liu R. Guidelines for antioxidant assays for food components. Food Front. 2020;1:60-9. doi:10.1002/fft2.10

26.    Tsvetkova D, Kostadinova I, Landzhov B, Vezenkov L, Marinov L, Ivanova I. Application of ABTS method for  assessment of radical-binding effect of Creatine monohydrate. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2023;13(2):92-8. doi:10.51847/rxgOGbIUkJ


 


Contact SPER Publications


SPER Publications and Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

HD - 236,
Near The Shri Ram Millenium School,
Sector 135,
Noida-Greater Noida Expressway,
Noida-201301 [Delhi-NCR] India