× Current Issue Archive Submit Article
Conflicts of Interest Copyright and Access Open access policy Editorial Policies Peer Review Policy Privacy Statement Publishing Ethics Generative AI Usage Policy
Editor in chief Associate Editors Advisory Board International Editors
Contact Us About Us Aim & Scope Abstracting And Indexing Author Guidelines Join As Editor

A jurisprudential analysis of paragraphs B and C of article 290 of Islamic penal code‎


Ali Zanganeh, Mohammad Nozari Ferdowsieh

Abstract

Murder is an offense of result. Intention of the result is the most important ‎component of mens rea or the crime's mental elements which is the defendant's ‎state of mind at the time of the offense. However, another type of murder has been ‎described by the legislators in different countries, including Iran's Penal Code ‎‎(criminal law), which is not being explicitly embodied in the intention of the result. ‎Accordingly, the murder without the intention of the result has been criminalized ‎based on paragraphs B and C of Article 290 of Islamic Penal Code. Although there ‎is no controversy among the majority of jurists in Iran and even in other countries, ‎on considering this murder as being intentional, it has been controversial in ‎expressing the mental element of the murder. The purpose of the present study was ‎to conduct a jurisprudential analysis of murder crime without the intention of the ‎result and also to examine the mental element of the crime. Regarding the literature ‎of this study, culpability is the only criterion to consider a murder as a deliberate ‎murder which necessitates qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment) and its mental element. ‎Therefore, in order for this crime to be the subject to qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment), ‎it is not necessary that the nature of the crime be intentional or, to have a force of ‎an intentional crime‎‎.




Contact Meral


Meral Publications
www.meralpublisher.com

Davutpasa / Zeytinburnu 34087
Istanbul
Turkey

Email: [email protected]