× Current Issue Archive Submit Article
Conflicts of Interest Copyright and Access Open access policy Editorial Policies Peer Review Policy Privacy Statement Publishing Ethics
Editor in chief Associate Editors Advisory Board International Editors
Contact Us About Us Aim & Scope Abstracting And Indexing Author Guidelines Join As Editor

A critical study about the faculty members' evaluation models


Akram Gazerani, Atefeh Dehnoalian, Ali Gharahzadeh, Farin Tatari‎

Abstract

Background:‎ Evaluation has history and antiquity in higher education, and it is the functions of universities’ ‎human resource management. In higher education, faculty members are one of the most ‎important assets, and institutions’ success depends on favorable effectiveness of faculty ‎members' performance. Therefore, the design and implementation of the evaluation process and ‎ensuring their optimal performance are essential.‎ Methods:‎ This study was conducted using the methodology of critical review. Keywords were selected, ‎and extensive and structured search of texts were conducted. 262 titles were retrieved. Then, ‎according to purposive sampling, screening of texts was conducted in three stages: (A) Initial ‎or title screening, (B) Secondary screening, (C) Tertiary screening. 41 articles were analyzed.‎ Results: The results suggested that merit review system and mission-based system have been ‎appropriate models for evaluating the faculty members at the universities of medical sciences‎‎‎‎.




Contact Meral


Meral Publications
www.meralpublisher.com

Davutpasa / Zeytinburnu 34087
Istanbul
Turkey

Email: [email protected]
Tell: +905344998991