Toxicity assessment of the selenium nanoparticles in vitro
Sofya Olegovna Budagova1*, Gregory Vadimovich Nadvodnyk1, Polina Alexandrovna Belskaia2, Angelina Andreevna Obukhova3, Ivan Gennadievich Lebedev3, Ramazan Magomedgadjievich Osmanov3, Gamzat Temurovich Dzhumaev4, Maxim Mavludinovich Agarzaev4
1Department of Therapy, Faculty of Dentistry, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia. 2Department of Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Moscow State Medical and Dental University named after A. I. Evdokimov, Moscow, Russia. 3Department of Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. 4Military Training Center, Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Correspondence: Sofya Olegovna Budagova, Department of Therapy, Faculty of Dentistry, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia. [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The negative effects of nanoparticles include cytotoxicity, the development of nonspecific inflammatory reactions and oxidative stress, and oncogenicity. In this regard, the assessment of the toxicity of nanoparticles is becoming increasingly relevant. Selenium nanoparticles were selected for the experiment. Acceptable ranges of nanoparticle concentrations for various research methods have been determined in experiments. In the MTT test, the average lethal concentration of selenium nanoparticles for cells of the A549 line and the FL subline practically coincided and amounted to 1.3 and 1 mg/ml, respectively, which is an order of magnitude higher than the average lethal concentration for human lymphocytes. In an experiment on rat cardiomyocytes, the LC50 of selenium nanoparticles was determined at the level of 8 µg/ml. In an experiment on cells of the A549 line, the suitability of trypan blue staining was evaluated to determine the number of dead (with impaired membrane permeability) cells. The number of dead cells, determined by the number of stained cells, turned out to be somewhat overestimated compared to the results of calculating the difference between living cells in the control and the experiment after flushing rounded and detached cells. When studying the effect of nanomaterials on the integrity of the cell membrane, it was found that the activity of LDH at maximum concentrations of nanomaterials increased by 1.5 times.
Keywords: Toxicity, Selenium, Nanoparticles, Cytotoxicity
Introduction
The number of names of nanomaterials and the volume of their application in various fields of science, medicine, energy, and industry is growing rapidly. The speed of nanotechnology development is ahead of the development of methods for assessing their safety and regulatory documents [1, 2]. Currently, there are practically no studies on the potential toxic properties of nanomaterials.
The small size of nanoparticles leads to multiple increases in the specific surface area of materials, which contributes to the transit of a variety of substances by increasing the adsorption capacity. The chemical reactivity and catalytic properties of the substance increase. These parameters are also directly affected by physicochemical properties, including shape, surface structure, and polarity [2, 3]. Therefore, the probability of the development of various processes within individual cellular structures increases organelles, biological membranes, penetration, and contact with the cell nucleus and DNA. To a large extent, the cytotoxic properties of nanoparticles are explained by their ability to aggregate inside cells [4-8].
Most of the studies on the assessment of the biological effect of nanoparticles were conducted on mammals and were aimed at studying the effects on the respiratory system [9, 10]. However, there are other ways of exposure, such as skin, gastrointestinal tract [11]. It should be taken into account that the protection mechanisms specific to a particular route of entry, capable of protecting the body from harmful chemicals, are not always consistent with respect to nanoparticles [12]. It should also be taken into account that nanoparticles can enter the circulatory system both from the environment and during therapeutic interventions, as well as a result of entering the body by any other means [13, 14].
Regardless of the route of entry, after entering the circulatory system, nanoparticles with blood are distributed throughout the body and can interfere with signal transmission processes. Nanoparticles with a diameter of > 40 nm are comparable in size to large proteins and can form various complexes with them depending on the properties of the surface. Complexes may have different biokinetics, activity, and even functions [15, 16]. If the particle does not disintegrate and its size exceeds 5 nm, the nanoparticle cannot be excreted through the kidneys and, thus, can cause more pronounced damaging effects in the body [17]. The release of inflammatory mediators due to the accumulation of nanoparticles in the lungs can cause hypercoagulation of blood and increase cardiovascular risk [18]. The development of atherosclerosis is also associated with exposure to nanoparticles [19, 20]. Nanoparticles can overcome the blood-brain barrier and penetrate the central nervous system [21, 22].
The main route of exposure to nanoparticles is inhalation. It is believed that the size of nanoparticles allows them to stay in the air for a long time, get into the lower respiratory tract, and penetrate the intercellular space, which prevents excretion from the body [23]. Nanoparticles, even if they are not toxic in chemical composition, can cause oxidative stress [24], release inflammatory mediators, and contribute to the occurrence of lung diseases and other systemic effects [25].
The impact on a person can be professional, directly in the production process, or indirectly through contamination of the air of the working area or office space, as well as accidental, as a result of atmospheric air pollution, by-product emissions [26].
Thus, the assessment of the toxic effect of nanoparticles of various chemical compositions and structures is relevant and timely. The establishment of testing principles and procedures to ensure the safe production and application of nanomaterials on the market is necessary and achievable. Studies aimed at developing adequate approaches to predicting the risk of nanoparticles affecting human health, taking into account the chemical structure, size, shape, physico-chemical properties, production technology, and scope of application at the initial stage, it is advisable to conduct in vitro. Acute toxicity was studied in white mice and guinea pigs. The initial weight of laboratory animals ranged from: for mice -
20-25g of guinea pigs - 350-400g, respectively. It seen that in the "green" synthesis, salts of different metals (Ag, Se, Au, Zn) can be used and the method is an eco-friendly one based on the direct reaction between the components mentioned above, while the presence of other elements not being necessary.
The purpose of this work was to develop methodological approaches to determining the toxicity of selenium nanoparticles for hygienic assessment of their safety. Selenium nanoparticles were chosen as an object of research due to the growing interest in the scientific community and the high dynamics of their industrial production for various purposes [27-29].
Materials and Methods
Selenium nanoparticles manufactured by Aldrich (USA) were used for the research: the content of selenium nanoparticles is 99.5%, and the particle size is <100 nm. The particles had an organic coating for dispersion in a polar solvent.
Cell cultures used for in vitro toxicity studies
Human lung carcinoma cells (A549) were cultured in DMEM medium with the addition of 10% inactivated calf embryonic serum (FBS), 45 units/ml of penicillin, and 45 mg/ml of streptomycin in 5% CO2 medium at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator (Figure 1).
|
Figure 1. A549 cell culture |
Human amnion cells (subline FL) have an epithelial-like morphology. Cultivation method: monolayer. Cultivation conditions: medium - 199 or EMEM, serum - cattle 10% (199); embryonic bovine 10% (EMEM). The procedure of re-sowing is the removal of cells using 0.02% versen with 0.1 mg/ml chymopsin, the multiplicity of sieving is 1:4 - 1:10, and the optimal density is 0.5-1.0x105 cells /ml. Karyology: 2n=46, the limits of variation in the number of chromosomes are 47-66, the modal number of chromosomes is 60, and the number of markers is 9, of which 3 are specific to NONLA cells (N 1,2,3, G discs). G6FDG isoenzymes, a.16. Sensitivity to human interferon. Field of application: virology, carcinogenesis, cell biology.
Human lymphocyte culture is one of the mandatory test systems for assessing the influence of mutagenic environmental factors. One of the advantages of this test system is that by the observed types of aberrations, the type of mutagenic effect can be quite definitely identified [30].
Blood was taken from the ulnar vein, and placed in a sterile tube containing a heparin solution (200 U/ml of blood). Under sterile conditions, blood samples were transfused 0.8 ml into Carrel vials with a culture medium prepared for cultivation. The composition of the culture medium: 6.16 ml of MEM medium; 1.6 ml of inactivated veal serum; 0.08 ml of L-glutamine; 0.08 ml of antibiotic solution; 0.15 ml of phytohemagglutinin. The vials were placed in a thermostat at 37 ° C to incubate the cells for 48 hours. To block mitosis at the metaphase stage, a solution of demecolcin in a concentration of 0.2 µg/ml of medium is added to the vials 2 hours before incubation. After incubation, the cell culture was poured into centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 15 minutes to precipitate the cells. The filler fluid was removed using a water jet pump, a hypotonic solution preheated to 37℃ (0.75 M KCl) was added and the precipitate was resuspended in it. Next, the tubes with cell culture were kept in a water bath (37℃) for 10-12 minutes. Upon reaching hypotonization, the sample was centrifuged again under the same conditions, followed by the removal of the supraventricular fluid. To fix the cells, the precipitate was resuspended in 1-1.5 ml of a freshly prepared fixative (a mixture of methyl alcohol and glacial acetic acid in a proportion of 3:1) on a shaker and brought its volume to 10 ml. The retainer was changed with subsequent centrifugation three times.
Culture of cardiomyocytes of rats of the SHR line. The starting material for the primary culture of rat cardiomyocytes is obtained by disaggregation with 0.25% trypsin solution at 37℃ for 30 minutes of the cardiac tissue of 12-14-day-old rat embryos. After the removal of trypsin, the precipitate is suspended in a growth medium (90% of the Needle medium, 10% of the embryonic serum of calves with the addition of antibiotics). The suspension is passed through a nylon filter (0.3 x 0.3 mm cell). After counting in the Goryaev chamber, the cells are seeded into 96-well plates and cultured in a DMEM growth medium.
Methods for studying the cytotoxicity of nanomaterials in mammalian cell cultures
The MTT test (Methyltetrazolium test) is designed to detect metabolic disorders, namely mitochondrial dysfunction, reflecting the effect on cell viability. The cells were grown in a CO2 incubator (Herra Cell) at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 80% relative humidity on 96-well plates (sowing concentration - 50-70 thousand cells/ml) [31]. For MTT, a set of CellTiter 96 AQuatic One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS), Promega was used. To measure the absorption of formazan, cells were incubated with MTS for 20 minutes in a thermostat, the absorption of formazan at λ = 492 nm was measured on an enzyme immunoassay device from Awareness, Microplate Rider Stat Fax 3200.
The evaluation result is statistically processed by Excel tools. The toxicity of nanoparticles was assessed by the IC50 indicator (the average inhibitory concentration is the concentration of a substance that suppresses this cellular function by 50%).
The method of assessing cell viability in culture by staining with trypan blue (methylene blue): assessing the integrity of the cell membrane is one of the most common ways to measure cell viability and cytotoxic effects [32]. Compounds with cytotoxicity often cause a violation of the integrity of the cell membrane, which can be established by vital staining with trypan blue (methylene blue), which freely penetrates through the damaged membrane and stains intracellular components, but is absent in healthy cells [33]. To assess viability, staining of cell suspensions is a more reliable method since when staining attached cells, they can detach from the substrate and be lost. The main disadvantage of this method is the inability to detect cells with impaired ability to reproduce [34, 35].
To experiment with different concentrations of selenium nanoparticles (100, 300 µg/ml), cells of the A549 line were sifted into 24-well plates. After the exposure window (8 and 24 hours), the cells were washed from the nanoparticles with saline solution, and stained with 0.4% dye solution. The number of dead colored cells was counted in five arbitrary fields of vision.
A method for assessing cell viability in culture by determining LDH activity: measurement of lactate dehydrogenase activity is used as one of the main tests for cytotoxicity [36]. The method is based on increasing the activity of the enzyme present in the cytoplasm of living cells in the culture medium, where it is released through damaged membranes of dead or dying cells. Small amounts of culture medium are taken at certain intervals after exposure to cells to measure the released lactate dehydrogenase and determine the dependence of the toxic effect on the time factor [37]. In this test, it is possible to assess the overall cytotoxicity in real time [38]. Lactate dehydrogenase is an oxidoreductase that catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate and lactate [39]. Cells secrete LDH into the bloodstream after damage or hemolysis of erythrocytes. Since LDH is a stable enzyme, it is widely used to assess the presence of damage or toxicity to tissues and cells. LDH also increases under certain pathological conditions, such as cancer. In the set used, LDH restores NAD+ to NADH+, which is specifically detected by the colorimetric method (450 nm).
The initial solutions of nanoparticles were prepared by dispersion in distilled water with the addition of albumin using four-fold ultrasonic treatment with a total duration of 1 h. Nanoselene concentration - 100, 300, 600, 800, 1000 µg/ml.
The MAK066 Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Assay Kit, Promega, was used for the test. LDH content was determined in a cell-free medium by adding a substrate (NAD+, tetrazoline salt, sodium lactate, etc.). During the determination, the following reactions occur the first reaction - LDH reduces NAD+ to NADH by oxidizing lactate to pyruvate). In the second reaction, the catalyst (diaphorase) transfers H/H+ from NADH to the tetrazoline salt, forming formazan.
Serum samples were used for analysis. 2-50 µl of the sample was added to the wells of a 96-well tablet in two repetitions. The samples were brought to a window-particle volume of 50 µl with a buffer for LDH analysis. 50 µl of the basic reaction mixture was added to each well. Well mixed by pipetting. After 2-3 minutes, the initial T was determined. The optical density (A450) was measured at the wavelength λ = 450 nm at the initial time. The tablets were incubated at 37 °C, taking measurements (A450) every 5 minutes. The time of the penultimate measurement is Finite. To measure the absorption of formazan, the samples were incubated for 5 minutes in a thermostat, the absorption of formazan was measured on an enzyme immunoassay device from Awareness, Microplate Rider Stat Fax 3200.
The concentration of the reaction product of the conversion of 7-ethoxy resorufin to 7-hydroxy resorufin was determined based on calibration based on experimental data. According to the calibration, the relative unit of optical density corresponded to the LDH content of 0.430 nmol/min/ml (iU/ml).
List of test equipment
All work with cell cultures was carried out in a sterile laminar box, cell culture was carried out in a CO2 incubator. The following equipment was used in the work: Laboratory centrifuge OPN-3,02, Axioskop40 microscope, TS 80M-2 electric dry-air thermostat, SNOL-67/350 drying cabinet, AU-12 microscope, Electronic scales Adventurer OHAUS, CO2 Incubator.
Results and Discussion
The effect of selenium nanoparticles on the viability of cells of A549, SHR, and subline FL lines according to the results of the MTT test
Cell death induced by nanoparticles was assessed by the change in the optical density of the solution relative to the control. The results are shown in Figure 2.
|
Figure 2. The effect of selenium nanoparticles on cells of various lines |
As the results of the MTT test showed, the average inhibitory concentration (IC50) of selenium nanoparticles - a concentration that suppresses the ability of cells to convert tetrazoline salt into formazan by 50%, determined graphically, for cells of the A549 line and the FL subline practically coincided and amounted to 1.3 and 1 mg/ml, respectively. In an experiment on rat cardiomyocytes, the IC50 of selenium nanoparticles was determined at the level of 8 mg/ml.
Thus, the data obtained in the experiment indicate a higher sensitivity of cells of the A549 and FL lines to the action of nanoparticles compared to rat cardiomyocytes. This is probably due to the higher rate of division of transformed cells and amnion cells, as well as the intensity of metabolism.
The effect of nanoparticles on the viability of human lymphocytes according to the results of the MTT test
In an experiment on human lymphocytes that were cultured for 48 hours, it was demonstrated with selenium nanoparticles (IC50 = 100 µg/ml). The average inhibitory concentration was determined graphically. The results of the experiment are shown in Figure 3.
|
Figure 3. The effect of selenium nanoparticles on human lymphocytes |
Comparing the results of the MTT test on human lymphocytes and the previous experiment, it can be concluded that selenium nanoparticles for lymphocytes are an order of magnitude more toxic than for any previously used cell culture.
Study of cytotoxicity of nanoparticles for A549 cells using methylene blue staining
Cells of the A549 line were seeded into 24-well plates, where selenium nanoparticles were introduced. A 0.4% solution of methylene blue was used to assess the viability of the cells. Staining was carried out 8 and 24 hours after the introduction of nanoparticles. The number of cells was counted in 5 arbitrary fields of vision, and the average value was calculated. The results of the experiment are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. The effect of selenium nanoparticles in various concentrations on the viability of cells of the A549 line |
|||||||
Experience option |
Number of cells |
||||||
8 hours |
24 hours |
||||||
Total number of cells |
Number of colored cells |
% death |
Total number of cells |
Number of colored cells |
% death |
||
selenium nanoparticles, 100 µg/ml |
67.2 |
4.6 |
6.8 |
88.4 |
5.6 |
6.3 |
|
selenium nanoparticles, 300 µg/ml |
74 |
29 |
37.3 |
42.2 |
32.6 |
77.2 |
|
It is shown that with increasing exposure time, the effect of selenium nanoparticles on cells increases. It can be concluded that the method of cell staining in culture with methylene blue is applicable to determine the cytotoxic effect of nanoparticles by assessing the integrity of cell membranes, which corresponds to the data presented in the works of other researchers [40, 41].
Study of cell viability in culture by lactate dehydrogenase activity in culture medium
LDH activity was studied in the A549 cell culture medium with the addition of selenium nanoparticles at concentrations from 100 to 1000 µg/ml, the exposure was 24 hours (Table 2).
Table 2. Results of studying the effect of selenium nanoparticles on LDH activity in A549 cell culture medium |
|
concentration of nanoparticles, µg/ml |
LDH activity, mU/ml |
100 |
278 |
300 |
302 |
600 |
366 |
800 |
414 |
1000 |
420 |
As a result, LDH activity at the maximum concentrations of the nanomaterial increased by 1.5 times, which corresponds to the results of other authors [42-44].
Conclusion
Selenium nanoparticles are the most promising objects for study since it has been established that selenium nanoparticles are one of the most promising types of metal nanoparticles [45]. At least 235 types of consumer goods, including toothpaste, dressings, and depilatory products, contain selenium nanoparticles. Probably, selenium nanoparticles will find wide application in the production of textiles, cosmetics, antiseptics, polymers, paint, and varnish materials. Their production and scope of application are increasing, which can lead to a negative impact on human health and the environment.
In the MTT test, the average lethal concentration of selenium nanoparticles for cells of the A549 line and the FL subline practically coincided and amounted to 1.3 and 1 mg/ml, respectively, which is an order of magnitude higher than the average lethal concentration for human lymphocytes. In an experiment on rat cardiomyocytes, the LC50 of selenium nanoparticles was determined at the level of 8 µg/ml.
In an experiment on cells of the A549 line, the suitability of trypan blue staining was evaluated to determine the number of dead (with impaired membrane permeability) cells. The number of dead cells, determined by the number of stained cells, turned out to be somewhat overestimated compared to the results of calculating the difference between living cells in the control and the experiment after flushing rounded and detached cells. It can be concluded that the method of cell staining in culture with methylene blue is applicable to determine the cytotoxic effect of nanoparticles by assessing the integrity of cell membranes.
When studying the effect of nanomaterials on the integrity of the cell membrane, it was found that the activity of LDH at maximum concentrations of nanomaterials increased by 1.5 times.
Acknowledgments: All the authors were involved in the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing, and editing of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: None
Financial support: None
Ethics statement: The protocol for experiments with laboratory animals complied with the requirements of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. All patients – lymphocyte donors were involved in the experiment only after signing the agreement for volunteer participation. All raw data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Halamoda-Kenzaoui B, Vandebriel RJ, Howarth A, Siccardi M, David CAW, Liptrott NJ, et al. Methodological needs in the quality and safety characterisation of nanotechnology-based health products: Priorities for method development and standardisation. J Control Release. 2021;336:192-206. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.016
2. Schulte PA, Geraci CL, Murashov V, Kuempel ED, Zumwalde RD, Castranova V, et al. Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16:2153. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2153-9
3. Khan Y, Sadia H, Ali Shah SZ, Khan MN, Shah AA, Ullah N, et al. Classification, Synthetic, and Characterization Approaches to Nanoparticles, and Their Applications in Various Fields of Nanotechnology: A Review. Catalysts. 2022;12(11):1386. doi:10.3390/catal12111386
4. Mahmood RA, Kockal NU. Nanoparticles used as an ingredient in different types of concrete. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3:529. doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04461-3
5. Shukla RK, Badiye A, Vajpayee K, Kapoor N. Genotoxic Potential of Nanoparticles: Structural and Functional Modifications in DNA. Front Genet. 2021;12:728250. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.728250
6. Dissanayake NM, Current KM, Obare SO. Mutagenic Effects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Biological Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10):23482-516. doi:10.3390/ijms161023482
7. Kladko DV, Falchevskaya AS, Serov NS, Prilepskii AY. Nanomaterial Shape Influence on Cell Behavior. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10):5266. doi:10.3390/ijms22105266
8. Pogribna M, Hammons G. Epigenetic Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):2. doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00740-0
9. Sonwani S, Madaan S, Arora J, Suryanarayan S, Rangra D, Mongia N, et al. Inhalation Exposure to Atmospheric Nanoparticles and Its Associated Impacts on Human Health: A Review. Front. Sustain. Cities. 2021;3:690444. doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.690444
10. Qiao H, Liu W, Gu H, Wang D, Wang Y. The Transport and Deposition of Nanoparticles in Respiratory System by Inhalation. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:394507. doi:10.1155/2015/394507
11. Pietroiusti A, Bergamaschi E, Campagna M, Campagnolo L, De Palma G, Iavicoli S, et al. The unrecognized occupational relevance of the interaction between engineered nanomaterials and the gastro-intestinal tract: a consensus paper from a multidisciplinary working group. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2017;14(1):47. doi:10.1186/s12989-017-0226-0
12. Fröhlich E, Salar-Behzadi S. Toxicological Assessment of Inhaled Nanoparticles: Role of in Vivo, ex Vivo, in Vitro, and in Silico Studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):4795-822. doi:10.3390/ijms15034795
13. Sushnitha M, Evangelopoulos M, Tasciotti E, Taraballi F. Cell Membrane-Based Biomimetic Nanoparticles and the Immune System: Immunomodulatory Interactions to Therapeutic Applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:627. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00627
14. Guido C, Maiorano G, Gutiérrez-Millán C, Cortese B, Trapani A, D’Amone S, et al. Erythrocytes and Nanoparticles: New Therapeutic Systems. Appl Sci. 2021;11(5):2173. doi:10.3390/app11052173
15. Chinnathambi S, Hanagata N, Yamazaki T, Shirahata N. Nano-Bio Interaction between Blood Plasma Proteins and Water-Soluble Silicon Quantum Dots with Enabled Cellular Uptake and Minimal Cytotoxicity. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(11):2250. doi:10.3390/nano10112250
16. Geldert A, Liu Y, Loh KP, Teck Lim C. Nano-bio interactions between carbon nanomaterials and blood plasma proteins: why oxygen functionality matters. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9(8):e422. doi:10.1038/am.2017.129
17. Du B, Yu M, Zheng J. Transport and interactions of nanoparticles in the kidneys. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(10):358-74. doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0038-3
18. Dumková J, Smutná T, Vrlíková L. Sub-chronic inhalation of lead oxide nanoparticles revealed their broad distribution and tissue-specific subcellular localization in target organs. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2017;14(1):55. doi:10.1186/s12989-017-0236-y
19. Hossaini Nasr S, Huang X. Nanotechnology for Targeted Therapy of Atherosclerosis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:755569. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.755569
20. Prilepskii AY, Serov NS, Kladko DV, Vinogradov VV. Nanoparticle-Based Approaches towards the Treatment of Atherosclerosis. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(11):1056. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111056
21. Zhang Y, Walker JB, Minic Z, Liu F, Goshgarian H, Mao G. Transporter protein and drug-conjugated gold nanoparticles capable of bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):25794. doi:10.1038/srep25794
22. Seko I, Şahin A, Tonbul H, Çapan Y. Brain-targeted nanoparticles to overcome the blood-brain barrier. J Pharm Technol. 2020;1(1):25-39.
23. Geiser M, Kreyling WG. Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7(1):2. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2
24. Khanna P, Ong C, Bay BH, Baeg GH. Nanotoxicity: An Interplay of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Cell Death. Nanomaterials. 2015;5(3):1163-80. doi:10.3390/nano5031163
25. Attarilar S, Yang J, Ebrahimi M, Wang Q, Liu J, Tang Y, et al. The Toxicity Phenomenon and the Related Occurrence in Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Brief Review From the Biomedical Perspective. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:822. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00822
26. Noventa S, Boyles MS, Seifert A, Belluco S, Jiménez AS, Johnston HJ, et al. Paradigms to assess the human health risks of nano- and microplastics. Micropl Nanopl. 2021;1(1):9. doi:10.1186/s43591-021-00011-1
27. Garza-García JJ, Hernández-Díaz JA, Zamudio-Ojeda A, León-Morales JM, Guerrero-Guzmán A, Sánchez-Chiprés DR, et al. The Role of Selenium Nanoparticles in Agriculture and Food Technology. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022;200:2528-48. doi:10.1007/s12011-021-02847-3
28. Blinov AV, Nagdalian AA, Siddiqui SA. Synthesis and characterization of selenium nanoparticles stabilized with cocamidopropyl betaine. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21975. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25884-x
29. Gudkov SV, Shafeev GA, Glinushkin AP, Shkirin AV, Barmina EV, Rakov II, et al. Production and Use of Selenium Nanoparticles as Fertilizers. ACS Omega. 2020;5(28):17767-74. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c02448
30. Rosendahl Huber A, Van Hoeck A, Van Boxtel R. The Mutagenic Impact of Environmental Exposures in Human Cells and Cancer: Imprints Through Time. Front Genet. 2021;12:760039. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.760039
31. Rzhepakovsky IV, Areshidze DA, Avanesyan SS, Grimm WD, Filatova NV, Kalinin AV, et al. Phytochemical Characterization, Antioxidant Activity, and Cytotoxicity of Methanolic Leaf Extract of Chlorophytum Comosum (Green Type) (Thunb.) Jacq. Molecules. 2022;27(3):762. doi:10.3390/molecules27030762
32. Garcia-Hernando M, Benito-Lopez F, Basabe-Desmonts L. Advances in Microtechnology for Improved Cytotoxicity Assessment. Front Mater. 2020;7:582030. doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.582030
33. Alhadlaq HA, Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M. Zinc ferrite nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative stress in different human cells. Cell Biosci. 2015;5:55. doi:10.1186/s13578-015-0046-6
34. Roger LM, Adarkwa Darko Y, Bernas T. Evaluation of fluorescence-based viability stains in cells dissociated from scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15297. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19586-7
35. Stiefel P, Schmidt-Emrich S, Maniura-Weber K. Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:36. doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x
36. Shibata S, Sogabe S, Miwa M, Fujimoto T, Takakura N, Naotsuka A, et al. Identification of the first highly selective inhibitor of human lactate dehydrogenase B. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21353. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00820-7
37. Pawlak J, Trzcionka A, Mertas A, Dziedzic A, Hildebrandt T, Tanasiewicz M. The Cytotoxicity Assessment of Novel Formulation Developed to Reduce Dentin Hypersensitivity Utilizing Dehydrogenase Assay. Coatings. 2021;11(2):217. doi:10.3390/coatings11020217
38. Forkasiewicz A, Dorociak M, Stach K. The usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase measurements in current oncological practice. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2020;25(1):35. doi:10.1186/s11658-020-00228-7
39. Jafary F, Ganjalikhany MR, Moradi A. Novel Peptide Inhibitors for Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA): A Survey to Inhibit LDHA Activity via Disruption of Protein-Protein Interaction. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4686. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38854-7
40. Blinov AV, Kachanov MD, Gvozdenko AA, Nagdalian AA, Blinova AA, Rekhman ZA, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Stabilized with Biopolymers for Application in Wound-Healing Mixed Gels. Gels. 2023;9(1):57. doi:10.3390/gels9010057
41. Hosseinzadeh R, Khorsandi K. Photodynamic effect of Zirconium phosphate biocompatible nano-bilayers containing methylene blue on cancer and normal cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14899. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51359-7
42. Razzaq A, Ali S, Asif M, In SI. Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) Based Photocatalysts: An Outstanding Strategy for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion. Catalysts. 2020;10(10):1185. doi:10.3390/catal10101185
43. Erdem JS, Závodná T, Ervik TK, Skare Ø, Hron T, Anmarkrud KH, et al. High aspect ratio nanomaterial-induced macrophage polarization is mediated by changes in miRNA levels. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1111123. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111123
44. Mironenko АV, Engashev SV, Deltsov AA, Vasilevich FI, Engasheva ES, Shabunin SV. Study of Acute Toxicity" Flyblok Insecticidal Tag. Pharmacophore. 2020;11(4):60-4
45. Miere FG, Ganea M, Teodorescu AG, Fritea L, Lestyan M, Horvath T, et al. The Green Synthesis of Silver and Selenium Nanoparticles using the Plant Stellaria Media (L.) Vill. Pharmacophore. 2022;13(2):88-95. doi:10.51847/rzjBEulH9c
Contact Meral
Meral Publications
www.meralpublisher.com
Davutpasa / Zeytinburnu 34087
Istanbul
Turkey
Email: [email protected]