TY - JOUR T1 - A critical study about the faculty members' evaluation models A1 - Akram Gazerani A1 - Atefeh Dehnoalian A1 - Ali Gharahzadeh A1 - Farin Tatari‎ JF - Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research JO - J Adv Pharm Educ Res SN - 2249-3379 Y1 - 2020 VL - 10 IS - 2 SP - 71 EP - 76 N2 - Background:‎ Evaluation has history and antiquity in higher education, and it is the functions of universities’ ‎human resource management. In higher education, faculty members are one of the most ‎important assets, and institutions’ success depends on favorable effectiveness of faculty ‎members' performance. Therefore, the design and implementation of the evaluation process and ‎ensuring their optimal performance are essential.‎ Methods:‎ This study was conducted using the methodology of critical review. Keywords were selected, ‎and extensive and structured search of texts were conducted. 262 titles were retrieved. Then, ‎according to purposive sampling, screening of texts was conducted in three stages: (A) Initial ‎or title screening, (B) Secondary screening, (C) Tertiary screening. 41 articles were analyzed.‎ Results: The results suggested that merit review system and mission-based system have been ‎appropriate models for evaluating the faculty members at the universities of medical sciences‎‎‎‎. UR - https://japer.in/article/a-critical-study-about-the-faculty-members-evaluation-models ER -