Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research
 
 
Original Article
Year : 2017   |  Volume : 7   |  Issue : 1   |  Page : 25-27  

Antifungal activity of Acacia catechu bark extract against dermatophytes: An in vitro study

Thilaga Thendral, T. Lakshmi

Correspondence Address:Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.197331

Abstract  

The objective of the study is to evaluate in-vitro antifungal activity of Acacia catechu against three human pathogenic fungi; Trichophyton rubrum, Microsporum gypseum, and Epidermophyton floccosum. A. catechu an evergreen tree which possess lots of medicinal value. It exhibits diverse pharmacological actions such as hepatoprotective, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activity. The herbal extract was tested against various concentrations adopting agar well diffusion method. The antidermatophytic activity indicated that the extract was ineffective and did not show any activity.

Keywords: Acacia catechu, antifungal, dermatophytes, zone of inhibition

How to cite this article:

Thendral T, Lakshmi T. Antifungal activity of Acacia catechu bark extract against dermatophytes: An in vitro study. J Adv Pharm Edu Res 2017;7(1):25-27.


Introduction   Top

Dermatophytes are a group of filamentous fungi that cause infections of the skin. Diseases caused by dermatophytes include athlete’s foot, ringworm, and nail infections. Dermatophyte infections in immune compromised patients can be quite severe.[1,2] Dermatophytes are fungi that require keratin for growth. The organisms colonize the keratin tissues and inflammation is caused by host response to metabolic byproducts.[3-5] These infections are long lasting and are difficult to treat.[6]

The incidence of dermatophytic infections has increased in the past decades. Dermatophytes are responsible for serious human pathogenic disorders in various parts of the world. The incidence of these infections are more in tropical countries, their humid climate, population, and poor hygiene make an ideal condition for the growth of these organisms. Although control measures are available, they have limited effectiveness. Conventional antifungal agents such as chlorhexidine and imidazole derivatives have limited uses. Due to their common side effects such as hepatotoxicity, nausea, diarrhea and impotency, the use is restricted in pregnant and the young people.[7-9]

Dermatophytic infections can be treated either topically or systemically; the method chosen will depend on the type of infection, the severity of the infection, and the patient’s preferences.[10]

Acacia catechu commonly known as karungali in Tamil and khadira in Sanskrit is an evergreen tree with lots of nutritional and medicinal value. People in Kerala consume karungali water for relieving digestive disorders.[11-15] It exhibits diverse pharmacological effects such as antibacterial, antioxidant, hepatoproective, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, analgesic, antipyretic, antiulcer, anticancer activity. The phytochemical constituents such as epigallocatechin, epicatechin, rutin, quercetin present in it produces antibacterial and antioxidant effects.[16-22]

Keeping this in view, this study was designed to evaluate the in vitro anti-dermatophytic activity of Ficus racemosa against Microsporum gypseum, Trichophyton rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum. 

Materials and methods   Top

Plant material

A. catechu willd. bark (AAE/9007) was collected from Hosur, Tamil Nadu, and was authenticated by Dr. H. B. Singh, raw materials herbarium and museum, NISCAIR, NewDelhi. The voucher specimen is preserved for further use in Green Chem Lab, Bengaluru.

Ethanolic extraction

Barks were shade dried for a week. Dried barks were milled to fine powder. Powder was passed through 100 mesh sieve and stored in a sealed polythene bag. 2.5 kg of powdered A. catechu bark were extracted with 10 L of ethanol, at 65°C temperature, for 1 h, in a 20 L round bottom flask with Graham condenser attached. Condenser  was cooled circulating with chilled water. After 1 h of extraction, round bottom flask was cooled to room temp and the extract was filtered and collected. The Marc was extracted repeatedly with 10 L of ethanol, twice. The extracts were filtered and collected. The combined extracts were evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure in a Buchi Rotary Evaporator (Switzerland) at 65°C, to obtain 150 g of powder extract. The w/w yield of the prepared extract was 6%. The extract was stored at 4°C until used.

Fungal cultures

Three fungal pathogens used were procured from the Institute of Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, viz., M. gypseum MTCC No. 2819, T. rubrum MTCC No. 296, and E. floccosum MTCC No. 613 and are maintained in Sabouraud dextrose agar.

Antifungal activity

Well diffusion method

On sterile plates containing Sabouraud dextrose agar, the fungal cultures were swabbed. Wells of 6 mm diameter were bored in each plate. The wells were filled with varying concentrations of the sample. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 72 h for evaluation. The diameter of inhibition zones formed around the wells was measured in millimeter. The study was performed in duplicates for all the samples.[23]

Results Discussion   Top

M. gypseum has been described as causing subcutaneous mycosis in humans and has been associated with opportunistic infections occurring in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.[24-26]

E. floccosum is an anthrophilic dematophyte worldwide in distribution. Humans and animals act as a host for this dermatophyte and the infection spreads by contact. These dermatophytes affect the cornified layers of epidermis. Their infection is more aggressive in immune compromised individuals.[27-29]

T. rubrum is an anthrophilic saprotroph. They are usually restricted to the upper layers of epidermis, deeper infections may also occur. They manifest as both acute and chronic infections affecting men more commonly than women; these infections are known to form folliculitis which is characterized by foreign body giant cells and fungal elements. In patients with immune deficiency extensive granuloma formation is seen.[30,31]

The study shows that there is no significant antifungal activity while testing against three dermatophytes, in which the M. gypseum, E.floccusum is most commonly affecting human and animal (Table 1).

Conclusion   Top

Dermatophytoses are refractory to treatment, and the spectrum of antifungal for treating dermatophytoses is narrow. However, we suggest that A. catechu bark extract do not exhibit pharmacological 

25376b0e-9642-49f3-bda0-526fe9415051.jpg

Acknowledgement   Top

References   Top

1. Gitao CG, Agab H, Khalifalla AJ. An outbreak of a mixed infection of Dermatophilus congolensis and Microsporum gypseum in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Saudi Arabia. Rev Sci Tech 1998;17:749-55.

2. Romano C, Massai L. Proximal subungual hyperkeratosis of the big toe due to Microsporum gypseum. Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:371-2.

3. Ghannoum MA, Perfect JR. Antifungal Therapy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 258.

4. Midgley G, Moore MK, Cook JC, Phan QG. Mycology of nail disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:S68-74.

5. Hainer BL. Dermatophyte infections. Am Fam Physician 2003;67:101-8.

6. Achterman RR, White TC. A foot in the door for dermatophyte research. PLoS Pathog 2012;8:e1002564.

7. Jessup CJ, Warner J, Isham N, Hasan I, Ghannoum MA. Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: Establishing a medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:341-4.

8. Curtis C. Use and abuse of topical dermatological therapy in dogs and cats. Part 1. Shampoo. Ther Pract 1998;20:244-51.

9. Vaijayantimala J, Prasad NR, Pugalendi KV. Antifungal activity of oils. Indian J Microbiol 2001;41:325-8.

10. Foster KW, Ghannoum MA, Elewski BE. Epidemiologic surveillance of cutaneous fungal infection in the United States from 1999 to 2002. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:748-52.

11. Lakshmi T, Anitha R, Geetha RV. Acacia catechu willd - A gift from Ayurveda to mankind - A review. T Ph Res 2011;5;273-93.

12. Lakshmi T, Kumar SA. Preliminary phytochemical analysis and in vitro antibacterial activity of Acacia catechu willd bark against Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus sanguis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int J Phytomed 2011;3:579-84.

13. Anonymous. The Wealth of India, Raw Material. Vol. 1. New Delhi: CSIR; 2004.

14. Qadry JS. Shah’s and Qadry’s Pharmacognosy. 12th ed. Ahmedabad: B.S Shah Prakashan; 2008. p. 302-3.

15. Lakshmi T, Magesh A, Rajendran R. Estimation of biomarker epicatechin in ethanolic bark extract of Acacia catechu willd by HPLC method. J Pharm Sci Res 2012;4:1764-7.

16. Sharma P, Dayal R, Ayyer KS. Acylglucosterole from Acacia catechu. J Med Aromat Plants Sci 1999;21:1002-5.

17. Jain R, Patni V, Arora DK. Isolation and identification of flavonoid “Quercetin” from Acacia catechu (L.F.) willd- A katha yielding plant. J Phytol Res 2007;20:43-5.

18. Lakshmi T, Rajendran R, Madhusudhanan N. Chromatographic fingerprint analysis of Acacia catechu ethanolic leaf extract by HPTLC technique. Int J Drug Dev Res 2012;4:180-5.

19. Naik GH, Priyadarsini KI, Satav JG, Banavalikar MM, Sohoni DP, Biyani MK, et al. Comparative antioxidant activity of individual herbal components used in Ayurvedic medicine. Phytochemistry 2003;63:97-104.

20. Negi BS, Dave BP. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Acacia catechu and its phytochemical analysis. Indian J Microbiol 2010;50:369-74.

21. Ghate NB, Hazra B, Sarkar R, Mandal N. Heartwood extract of Acacia catechu induces apoptosis in human breast carcinoma by altering bax/bcl-2 ratio. Pharmacogn Mag 2014;10:27-33.

22. Alambayan J, Vats M, Sardana S, Sehrawat R. Evaluation of antiulcer activity of roots of Acacia catechu willd. (Mimosoideae). J Pharm Phytochem 2015;3:79-84.

23. Jyothilakshmi M, Jyothis M, Latha MS. Antidermatophytic activity of Mikania micrantha Kunth: An invasive weed. Pharmacognosy Res 2015;7 Suppl 1:S20-5.

24. Rippon JW. Medical Mycology: The Pathogenic Fungi and the Pathogenic Actinomycetes. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1988.

25. Currah R. Taxonomy of the onygenales. Mycotaxon 1985;24:1-216.

26. Demange C, Contet-Audonneau N, Kombila M, Miegeville M, Berthonneau M, De Vroey C, et al. Microsporum gypseum complex in man and animals. J Med Vet Mycol 1992;30:301-8.

27. Alexender B Schimidt, Heinrich Dorflet, Heinrich Grabenhorst, HannaTuovila, Jouko Rikkinen. Fungi of the bitterfeld amber forest – Exkurs.f.und.verofftl. DGG,249;S.54-60,13.

28. Hosseininejad M, Ebrahimi A, Hosseini F. Isolation of Epidermophyton floccosum from a Persian squirrel. Comp Clin Pathol 2009;19:215-6.

29. Seddon ME, Thomas MG. Invasive disease due to Epidermophyton floccosum in an immune compromised patient with Behçet’s syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:153-4.

30. Weitzman I, Summerbell RC. The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8:240-59.

31. DiSalvo AF, editor. Occupational Mycoses. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1983. 

Figures